.
Secret Intelligence Service
ARCHIVE
.
Extract from a conversation between (C-I) and (C-V) subject PSYOP – in brief, redacted
Unit
.
__________________________________________________________________________________________
.
Expanded section not available
18-10-16 1300 – 1330 – 1330 hrs. GMT
Harrogate. United Kingdom
.
On the Corrupting of Minds and Instigating Scandal
.
METHODS OF MANIPULATION
.
Mystification
Control of mass media
The poisoning of worldviews
Primal Fears
Divide and conquer
Indoctrination
Denial, hassle, ridicule
Controlled opposition
Financial system
Food and medicine
Illusion of time Religion – binding
The use of subversive symbolism
.
*********************************************************************
(C-I) To continue. I was thinking about it just now, I mean about how to introduce the subject more provocatively – What it’s about, being more ‘provocative’. Here are my notes, and I have a name; The corrupting of minds and instigating scandal.
.
* Certain life events pertaining to a person or persons can be instigated via someone else, the intention to provoke these is that of the ************ (I’m referring to myself).
* These life events are instigated by messing around with what I know already to be visceral, metabolic, psychological responses.
* I can make the reader think and act within the frame that I intend.
* In this psychodrama frame the reader can’t resist against the responses I set in motion.
* The words, the very specific associations I create are lived out by the reader either in fantasy or in the world.
* Often the one/s under the writer’s influence will deny the relationship with what I have caused to happen. They will lie about it to themselves and in public.
* Often this is seen as mind corruption, indoctrination, psyop.
* The power is in the pen
I can be more specific regarding my intentions and what is to be the case for the one/s under the influence of my seduction.
.
(C-I) Hi. This is something more to think about. (referring to her notes)
.
What to provoke, my/our reason? It has sinister over tones.
The conscious self is understood little for its complexity. Can cause the senses to dance in joy, such as seen in the etiology of addictions. Possible to keep reinforcing it by appeal to unconscious/unaware facets of the person or whoever group is ‘targeted’.
Particular ‘aspects’ pertaining to the human body and certain behaviours disturb the composure.
The reader becomes the actor once the thoughts are set in motion. There are dangers involved because unlike the movies, media and advertising you can mine to the core of a person’s essence.
Resisting is a waste of time because doing so makes the impulses build up and their unleashing becomes a torrent.
Very specific associations, some very powerful and we are referring to psych-warfare, might not be appropriate here (can see where I took it from – my website, note the ‘my’)
You see the denial in play often while a person defends themselves (tells lies)
The power is in the pen and this is an apt statement to make given the emphasis these days on technological aids.
I used the word seduction. I like this word. It has womanly authority at its core.
.
(laughter)
.
(C-I) The word seduction and the word corrupting I suppose, are interchangeable. Most would say they want to be corrupted. Those who say otherwise are no different, as you know. **************************************
.
(C-V) It might not be the most appropriate of strategies to discuss here. It all depends on the motivation of the one who is setting the whole thing going. Isn’t it to control and or disrupt by using strategies of pycho-warfare? **************************************************************************
You are correct when the disturbing of someone’s composure is a calculating and effective process. One person’s state of mind can become many and all the time the precursors and the reinforcers are elsewhere, even in a different country.
I think (hope) we could talk about how the same technique can induce qualitatively different states of mind than is the usual practice of psycho-warfare, if I understand it correctly. I’m referring to how things can be felt to be much better, an altered state where there is an association bound in an aesthetic experience. *******************************
(C-V) What do you define as being ‘the core of a person’s essence’? What’s the weather like over there and what’s happening later, tonight? *****************************
.
(C-I) Yes, I was referring to the reach inside and to the most profound element, -it’s more the ‘effect engineered’ than a ‘location’, what remains as an intoxicant and lives both in conscious awareness and below, influencing thoughts from then on. How’s that sound?
I like to think we are more than a passing fancy.
Actually it’s been warm here and it’s going to be a scorching hot mid-summer. As you know I like to wander through the grounds while the sun is setting. I love this quiet time. Though there’s a good amount of hush hush here, there are lots going off.
(C-I) I asked a person (****************) what it felt like while being the target of a honey trap, a psycho-drama that was orchestrated. The sheer welling of feeling within that could not be dampened and it was being injected at the same time with relevant physical ‘intimate things’ that were being placed where they could influence all of the senses. The result was a person out of his own control and altogether within ours……Maybe shouldn’t talk about this out in the open? ****************************************************
(C-V) I don’t think talking shop is a good idea. But I see what you are saying, that the bundle of feelings is very intensely felt, but you are saying much more than that.
You are talking about the purpose of the effort, which is to control what someone is thinking and via additional cues to provoke this state of mind even more. The subsequent behavior of the person under your control is easier to predict in the light of this. It depends what the purpose is and I suppose, ‘who’. I don’t care for the word ‘target’.
Now you have me on it, some would accuse of sinister intent as opposed to it all being an innocent thing, though it would appear so.
Something appearing in a particular way while the reason for it is otherwise is rife. *****************
I know more about this now after reading what you wrote on the other site again. This is where the ‘corrupting of minds’ enters in because causing a particular change is, I suppose, ‘corrupting’ if the content is such and such. The scandal or threat of it is a further tool that holds the behaviour of the person on a certain path. Wow. ************************
.
I wonder how many have been victims and who they are and ******** ****, don’t tell me on here.
The axiom being that it does not matter a hoot who or what a person professes to be, if they come under PSYOP scrutiny (yours) it is absolutely certain they will be ‘seductively compromised.’ I am smiling as I think of those claiming total adherence to some belief and then there is the other reality you have impregnated into them, simply because they are all susceptible, irrespective of what they tell others, show others….Brighter lights, darker shadows. **************************
It gets better when there is the unconscious brought into play, the subject is not wholly aware of what is provoking their thoughts. It is the addiction, the desire that just cannot be quelled, no matter what and where it came from remaining a mystery to the person. ***********************************
Why do I have the image of a man whose audience, most notably his wife, has this expectation built on all manner of statements and propaganda while all the time there is the hypocrite lurking. SCANDAL !
.
(laughter)
.
(C-I) No one has a casual conversation on PSYOP. What then be our reason? That’s what certain of our readers will be asking.
Let me point toward ‘irresistible urges’. When you look at how society has organized its response to these, you will see how violence, blood and gore, even torture has become ordinary such that there are those inured to the real thing when it’s presented to them, I mean they can’t tell the difference and respond as though it’s just part of life. ********************
You have to contrast this with what owns the ultimate power and authority and think how this is hidden and defended against in case it gets out. It sounds simple but nudity, the female anatomy specifically, owns the capacity to ignite the urges and such that containing them is the stuff of fantasy. There are those who won’t agree because they won’t admit to seeing it this way themselves. The point being that as a weapon, the female and I am referring to suggestive motions of the body, to fragrances, to attitude and to personality. There are certain suggestive conversational statements relating to these which are employed. The necessity to indulge is a highway set upon without limit of speed or end point and all the time is the heart palpitation, the tightening of the emotional noose.
There are those who see the malefactorious in this but they are seeing it in themselves and their critical stances are denials of their own makeup. ********************************************************
Targets are not the merry widower from number fifteen across the street as you know, but people who are deemed useful in certain ways.
.
(C-V) HONEY TRAPS (raised voice). I have a question about the honey trap. ***************************** ****** **
Is the word ‘scandal’ describing a contrived bit of feed given to the tabloids by you, such that the ‘target’ is; compromised fully, compromised in part and either of these to write the target off the books once of no more use, or .… because the whole thing gets leaked to the press by someone else, such as was the case in the (dated?) Profumo scandal?
It’s not the target who would ‘leak’ (ha!) but someone entangled in the world the target is part of (where put by you) and this someone also being implicated for purposes of reinforcing the effect of your ‘intervention’.
I’m trying to say without using certain terms! ******************************
It must be difficult controlling certain roles (such as a Christine Keeler role), if there is the temptation to raise big bucks by going to the press and spilling the beans on the whole thing. ******************************************************
Therefore, is it more manageable when there is just the ‘target’ and you.
.
(C-V) I’m getting into this topic as you can see. The threat of something being leaked by you constitutes extortion/blackmail. Ostensibly this is against the law, but I guess if national security is at stake the law is non-applicable.
I have a further question: Concerning yourself, have you been suspicious of events taking place around you? I mean have you ever suspected being a target yourself, either set up by some ‘foreign agent’ or those closer to home as a test?
Wow, this is interesting!
(C-I) The process that is the ideal is when the target never suspects our interference. The fear of annihilation that the prospect of never consummating is what we manipulate.
Yes, there certainly is the risk of my being compromised, but it’s not likely for a variety of reasons. I live an isolated life and with the same colleagues. ***********************************************
We must continue this discussion. Politics! Tar tar, for now.
(Termination of conversation)
(c) 2017
.
Secret Intelligence Service
Unit
.
.
Secret Intelligence Service
Adversitate. Custodi. Per Verum
MMXVII
__________________________________________________________________________________________